Most economically advantageous award criteria sentences to ponder
“”
As I have said many times, even as a proponent of using most economically advantageous tender criteria in public procurement, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
“”
As I have said many times, even as a proponent of using most economically advantageous tender criteria in public procurement, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
As we are drawing curtains on the European preference chapter of the proposed Public Procurement Act, we have a poll on Linkedin running for the next week to help us decide which section should fall under our legal scalpel. I think we chose some meaty options to keep us entertained
Article 75 appears to be a simple article, giving the European Commission the powers to adopt the necessary delegated acts to mandate the application of the European preference included in Article 73 in accordance with the conditions imposed by Article 141. What is optional and to the discretion of the
Article 74 appears to be a simple one at first glance, as it simply points towards different pieces of legislation where to identify the origin of economic operators, subcontractors and goods. For services and works it mostly follows the rules for economic operators/subcontractors and goods. Marko's entry
Article 73 creates the operational requirements that public buyers are to consider when implementing European preference requirements. Effectively, this article allows but does not mandate the discrimination of economic operators, goods, services and works. This is an Article that requires a careful side-by-side reading with Articles 71 and